Jun 01, 2026
One of the biggest misconceptions in commercial real estate is assuming that if a charging operator rejects a property, the site isn't viable for EV charging.
That's often not true.
In many cases, the property didn't fail. The charging operator's business model did.
Yet many commercial real estate owners treat a CPO's underwriting decision as the final verdict on whether EV charging belongs at their property.
It shouldn't be.
Most charging network operators are solving for a very specific business model.
Their site selection process often focuses on factors such as:
Those are rational considerations if you're building a nationwide public charging network.
The challenge is that these filters were largely designed around corridor charging.
They don't necessarily reflect how people use local retail destinations.
Many properties that fail traditional charging operator underwriting still possess characteristics that create strong long-term charging opportunities.
Examples include:
These properties often succeed because they are embedded into customers' weekly routines.
People visit them repeatedly for errands, dining, shopping, and entertainment.
That behavior matters.
A common assumption in public charging is that drivers prioritize traffic counts and highway visibility.
In reality, convenience often wins.
Many EV drivers would rather charge while doing something they already planned to do.
Consider two charging locations:
A large retail center located near a freeway exit with high traffic counts.
A neighborhood center that includes:
For many drivers, the second option is more attractive even if the traffic counts are lower.
The charging session becomes part of an existing routine rather than a dedicated stop.
That's a fundamentally different customer behavior model than what many traditional charging operators evaluate.
Infill retail properties are often judged against assumptions designed for large-scale public charging deployments.
That can lead to missed opportunities.
These sites may not justify:
But they may support a different approach.
A smaller deployment strategy could offer:
For property owners, that changes the economics entirely.
A charging operator's rejection should be treated as a data point, not a final answer.
The operator may be evaluating the site through the lens of network expansion, capital efficiency, or portfolio optimization.
A property owner, however, has different objectives.
You care about:
Those goals don't always align with a traditional charging operator's site selection model.
As EV adoption continues to grow, charging behavior will likely become increasingly tied to daily routines.
Drivers will charge where they shop, eat, work, and spend time.
That creates opportunities for community-centered retail locations that have historically been overlooked by traditional charging models.
The best EV charging sites aren't always the ones with the highest traffic counts.
Sometimes they're the places people already want to visit.
And that may mean many commercial real estate owners are sitting on stronger EV charging opportunities than they realize.